Why I am enthusiastically supporting Mark Kleinschmidt for mayor

It has been my pleasure to serve on the Town Council for six years with Mark Kleinschmidt, and now I want to add my voice to those urging you to vote for him for mayor. Mark has been in leadership positions on important initiatives, helping to create the conditions that have led Chapel Hill—just this year—to being named both America’s Most Livable City and Best Place in the Country to Start a Business. Such honors are regularly earned by Chapel Hill, in large part because of progressive policy decisions that have led to our phenomenally successful fare-free transit system (7 million rides a year), the purchase and maintenance of open space and parklands, and other environmentally important initiatives including a strong stormwater management program and land use ordinances that protect the natural environment. With Mark’s leadership, we have achieved these goals and more, all the while maintaining a AAA bond rating (a rarity for small cities).

As chair of the Council’s economic development committee, Mark oversaw the town’s hiring of its first economic development officer, and he continues to take a leadership position in working to bring new business to town. Mark is also a strong advocate for the Downtown Partnership, which has been working to improve the life of the downtown through creating open wireless network; revitalizing the street life by hiring musicians to perform on the sidewalks; championing a new lighting system; and more.

In our successful negotiations with UNC over the development agreement for Carolina North, I witnessed Mark’s persuasive leadership on important issues such as fiscal equity and the permanent conservation of open space.

In the current climate—when many of us are faced with at least a double hit, from the recession generally and last year’s property reevaluations in particular—the economy, and taxes, are important issues. Mark is committed to maintaining a lean, efficient town government. But I am proud of him for what he hasn’t said: he has not uttered the words “No new taxes.” Why not? Because one Council member alone—even if he is the mayor—does not have the power to make that decision. And further, because such a pledge is bad policy. It puts too much at risk—including the planned expansion of the public library that the voters have overwhelmingly supported in a bond referendum.

As a community we have worked diligently and prudently to establish several long-range community goals. In recent years we've established a debt management fund that makes it less likely that we will have to raise taxes in order to achieve these goals, but adopting the mantra of no new taxes promises only to replicate the failed fiscal policies that endangered public services for our nation in the early 90s and for our state earlier this decade. We knew what a great town Chapel Hill was even before the National Conference of Mayors named us the Most Livable City in America, but in order to continue to live up to that recognition we need to remain true to the community process and the priorities we have set for ourselves. We must not give in to feel-good rhetoric that has the potential to put even basic services on the chopping block. Mark trusts our community to work through issues carefully, through broad and open public deliberations, as the best way of deciding what we value enough to fund and what we can live without.

Mark is a leader, a listener, and a proven team-builder. I’ve seen these qualities demonstrated consistently for my six years on the Council. He will be a great mayor. I urge you to join me in casting your vote for him on Tuesday.

Peace and protest, justice and injustice: marking Chapel Hill's sacred space

A little-known fact: grass used to grow around the flag pole in front of the old post office on Franklin Street. That's why those red brick pavers are there--as filler. It was only in latter times, probably since 1979 when the town purchased the property from the federal government, that the space was paved over.

Luckily for these four young men, it was grass during Holy Week in 1964 when they decided to fasten themselves to this place 24 hours a day, fasting in protest of the Town of Chapel Hill's refusal to pass a public accommodations ordinance.

Pat Cusick, LaVert Taylor, John Dunne, James Foushee (in the photo) and countless other activists will be remembered this Sunday at 3 p.m. as we unveil and formally dedicate the Peace and Justice tribute marker at the site we've named Peace and Justice Plaza.

Please join us for the celebration. Opening remarks by Mayor Kevin Foy, Sen. Ellie Kinnaird, and local NAACP chapter president Michelle Laws will be followed by brief tributes to the people honored on the marker. We will also recognize Yonni Chapman, historian, for his tireless work to ensure that past struggles for civil rights in Chapel Hill are remembered. Dan Pollitt, emeritus professor in the UNC School of Law, will conclude with some personal recollections of his own experiences on the front lines of local battles for civil rights and social justice.

The marker bears the names of nine people who devoted much of their lives to working for causes of peace and social justice in our community: Charlotte Adams, Hank Anderson, James Brittian, Joe Herzenberg, Mildred Ringwalt, Hubert Robinson, Joe Straley, Lucy Straley, and Gloria Williams.

At the top of the marker is a quote from Martin Luther King, Jr.:

True peace is not simply the absence of some negative force; it is the presence of justice.

The marker is a flat granite paver, flush to the ground, directly in front of the flag pole. It is designed so that other names can be added in the future.

What's been most remarkable lately, as town employees have worked to remove one section of the brick pavers and ready the space for the installation, has been an archaeological discovery. On the concrete base that was poured to stabilize the brick pavers when they were laid, someone etched a swastika. (Click on the photo for an enlarged view; it's in the lower corner.) Emily Cameron, landscape architect for the town, puts it beautifully in perspective: "We thought it was worth noting that we have removed an historic symbol of hate and racial prejudice that had been hidden at the foot of our nation’s flag to replace it with a marker to commemorate the struggle for equality, justice, and peace."

New prospects

I've become an urban commuter. Without having to drive any farther than the new Durham Amtrak station, I'm able to sit down, read a book, enjoy the view, and, an hour later, set foot on Washington Street in downtown Greensboro. I wheel my spiffy rolling brief case up Elm Street, past the old Woolworth's that's being made (finally) into a civil rights museum, past the elegant old Jefferson Pilot building, to the law school. I do this two days a week. It thrills me every time I walk in the door of Elon University School of Law, a mid-century modern treasure designed by Edward Loewenstein to house the Greensboro Public Library. The $6 million transformation, completed in 2006, was beautifully and lovingly carried out.

As a total newcomer, I'm intrigued by downtown Greensboro. There isn't much of it--of the compact high-density old/new Greensboro, that is--but what's there is pretty interesting. I hoped David Wharton would have had something to say about it, and so he has, in a great photo essay. The issue currently, it appears, is whether to enact design guidelines for the downtown. It'll be interesting to see how that discussion plays out. From my perspective as an elected official charged with overseeing the vitality of Chapel Hill's downtown, I hope some version of the proposed standards is implemented.

What a nice surprise to see that my favorite architecture critic, Chicago's Blair Kamin, has already weighed in on Greensboro. Speaking there two years ago, he brought stories from Chicago but emphasized that each city has its own DNA. Rightly, he praised Elm Street for its walkability and charm, while noting that "the downtown still has far too many streets that seem like miniature expressways—more corridors for cars than places for people."

The jewel of downtown Greensboro--luckily, one block from the law school--is the new Center City Park (completed in December 2006). What a happy place to spend a lunch hour! Its designers smartly engaged the Project for Public Spaces early on in the planning, and it shows. The park is beautiful, functional, walkable, sittable (in shade or sun), easily programmable (music at noon every Wednesday), and just plain inviting. David Wharton goes point by point through the Project for Public Spaces' 10 principles for good parks, finding happily that it measures up.

Which way will Greensboro go? Will the process of revitalizing the downtown into a lively, livable/walkable/workable place continue? or is there cause for concern that even Elm Street is in danger?

I'm only an urban commuter here, but I'm pulling for this downtown, voting with my feet every time I glide up Elm Street. Meanwhile, Center City Park reminds me that someday--before too much longer, I hope--we'll see our own beautiful and well-designed downtown park--the one designed by Mikyoung Kim for the 140 West project, also according to those tried and true principles set forth by the Project for Public Spaces.

Tomatoes

Today is Tomato Day at the Carrboro Farmers Market. This essay was published in the "Tomato" issue of the Carrboro Free Press on July 8, 2009.

Overheard at the Carrboro Farmer’s Market, mother to silent daughter: “The ugliest tomatoes are actually the ones that taste the best.” I wondered if this one-way conversation would take the obvious metaphorical turn, but it stayed straight on message. “Mommy is very picky about her tomatoes,” she continued as she examined a promising German Johnson.

Except for recognizing the inherent superiority of the home-grown varieties, I can’t claim to have ever been that picky about my tomatoes. Since I grew up in rural East Texas, my husband, bred in Charlotte, finds this to be curious.

Trips to the farmer’s market with Paul in high summer are quests for the ugliest, tastiest tomatoes. In reaction to the acidy Burpee’s Big Boys that he remembers from his father’s backyard garden, he’s after sweetness, with enough texture to stand up to the heat of the stovetop. Pink Girls, Cherokee Purples, all manner of lyrical names will join the reliable German Johnsons in soups and gumbos and biryanis and jamablayas of his own invention.

Assembling the tomatoes with other seasonal picks from the market, he’ll jump from cookbook to internet recipe to suggestions from his “tweeple” till he finds the magical combination of ingredients. He’ll put our son Tucker to work at the chopping board, encouraging all kinds of proper habits, not to mention the love of a good meal carefully prepared.

At 16, Tucker is ripe for embarrassment, though that’s not my aim in sharing the story behind one of his best works of art. Preschool age being the high point of abstract expressionism for so many, the daycare years brought out a talent in Tucker that he has since let languish.

On construction paper washed in pink he painted a fury of reds and greens, with a red center of gravity, random spokes of the red and green contributing energy and intensity. This creation of our young Jackson Pollock ended up on the coffee table next to a New York Times Sunday Magazine. The magazine happened to have a picture of a tomato splattered on its otherwise stark white cover. Tucker looked at the two, pointed to his own, and proclaimed, “Tomato!”

The topic of the cover story was politics: the Gingrich Revolution of 1994, symbolized by an iconic image of the tomato as hand grenade. Out of the mouths of babes, though. With that pleasurable cry of discovery—Tomato!—political symbol was reduced to its literal essence, while the abstract was translated into a piercing reality, a bright red tomato so juicy it could not be contained. Home grown, to be sure.